| |
CHAPTER
II.
VIRGINIA STATESMEN LEAD TOWARD A BETTER UNION.
1784.
|
|
Page 146 |
Of many causes promoting
union, four above others exercised a steady and commanding influence. The new republic as
one nation must have power to regulate its foreign commerce; to colonize its large domain;
to provide an adequate revenue; and to establish justice in domestic trade by prohibiting
the separate staes from impairing the obligation of contracts. Each of these four causes
was of vital importance; but the necessity for regulating commerce gave the immediate
impulse to a more perfect constitution. Happily, the British order in council of the
second of July, 1783, restricted to British subjects and ships the carrying of American
produce from American ports to any British West India island, and the carrying of the
produce of those islands to any port in America. "This proclamation," wrote John
Adams to congress, "is issued in full confidence that the United States cannot agree
to act as one nation. They will soon see the necessity of |
Chap.
II.
1783. |
|
measures to counteract their
enemies. If there is not sufficient authority to draw together the minds, affections, and
forces of the states in their common foreign concerns, we shall be the sport of
trans-atlantic politicians, who hate liberty and every country that enjoys it. [1] Letters of Adams and one of like tenor from Franklin having been fully
considered, congress, on the twenty-ninth of Septermber, 1783, agreed that the United
States could become respectable only by more energy in government; but, as usual, they
only referred "the important subject under consideration" to a special
committee, [2] which, having Arthur Lee for one of its members, in due time reported that
"as the several states are sovereign and independent, and possess the power of acting
as may to them seem best, congress will not attempt to point out the path. The mode for
joint efforts will suggest itself to the good sense of America." [3]
The states could not successfully defend themselves against the
policy of Great Britain by separate legislation, because it was not the interest of any
one of them to exclude British vessels from their harbors unless the like measure should
be adopted by every other; and a union of thirteen distinct powers would encounter the
very difficulty which had so often proved insuperable. But, while every increate of the
power of congress in domestic affairs roused jealousies between the states, the selfish
design of a |
Chap.
II.
1783.
Sept.
29. |
Page 147 |
1. Dip. Cor., vii. 81, 88, 100.
2. Secret Journals of Congress, iii. 398-400. |
3. Reports of committees on increasing the powers of congress, p. 95. MS. |
|
|
foreign government to repress their industry drew them together against a common
adversary.The complete cession of the north-west and
the grant of the desired inpost were the offerings of Virginia to the general welfare. [1]
Simultaneously, her legislature, in December, took cognizance of the aggression on equal
commerce. The Virginians owned not much shipping, and had no special interest in the West
India trade; but the British prohibitory policy offended their pride and their sense of
honor, and, as in the war they had looked upon "union as the rock of their political
salvation," so they again rang the bell to call the other states to council. They
complained of "a disposition in Great Britain to gain partial advantages injurious to
the rights of free commerce, and repugnant to the principles of reciprocal interest and
convenience, which form the only permanent foundation of friendly intercourse;" and
unanimously consented to empower congress to adopt the most effectual mode of
counteracting restrictions on American navigation so long as they should be continued. [2]
The governor, by direction, communicated the act to the executive authority of the other
states, requesting their immediate adoption of similar measures; [3] and he sent to the
delegates of his own state in congress a report of what had been done. This is the first
in the series of measures through which Virginia marshalled the United States on their way
to a better union. |
Chap.
II.
1783.
Dec.
4.
9. |
Page 148
|
1. Joseph Jones to Jefferson, 21 and 29 Dec., 1783. MSS.
2. Journal of House of Delegates, 50; Hening, xi. 313. |
3. Journal of House of Delegates for 22 Dec., 1783. Governor Harrison to the
governor of Massachusetts, 25 Dec., 1783. MS. |
|
|
In the fourth congress, Jefferson carried forward the work of Madison with alacrity. The
two cherished for each other the closest and the most honorable friendship, agreeing in
efforts to bind the states more closely in all that related to the common welfare. In
their copious correspondence they opened their minds to each other with frankness and
independence.The delegates of Rhode Island insisted
that the counteraction of the British navigation acts must be intrusted to each separate
state; but they stood alone, Roger Sherman voting against them, and so dividing
Connecticut. Then the proposal of the committee of which Jefferson was a member and of
which all but Gerry were from the South, that congress,m with the assent of nine states,
might exercise prohibitory powers over foreign commerce for the term of fifteen years, was
adopted without opposition. [1]
Keeping in mind that, while the articles of confederation
did not directly confer on congress the regulation of commerce by enactments, they granted
the amplest authority to frame commercial treaties, Jefferson prepared a plan for
intercourse with powers of Europe, from Britain to the Ottoman Porte, and with the Barbary
states. His draft of instructions [2] described "the United States as one nation upon
the principles of the federal constitution." [2] In a document of the preceding
congress, mention had been made of "the federal government," and Rhode Island |
Chap.
II.
1784.
April
30. |
Page 149
|
1. Journals of Congress, iv. 392, 393.
2. Jefferson of John Q. Adams, |
30 March, 1826. Jefferson, vii. 436.
3. Secret Journals of Congress, iii. 453. |
|
|
had forthwith moved to substitute the word union, conceding that there was a union of the
states, but not a government; but the motion had been supported by no other state, and by
no individuals outside of Rhode Island except Holton and Arthur Lee. This time Sherman and
his colleague, James Wadsworth, placed Connecticut by the side of Rhode Island. They were
joined only by Arthur Lee, and congress, adopting the words of Jefferson, by the vote of
eight states to two, of nineteen individuals to five, decided that in treaties and in all
cases arising under them the United States form "one nation." [1]On the principles according to which commercial treaties should be
framed America was unanimous. In October, 1783, congress had proposed the most perfect
equality and reciprocity. [2] Jefferson, while he would accept a system of reciprocity,
reported as the choice of America that there should be no navigation laws; no distinction
between metropolitan and colonial ports; an equal right for each party to carry its own
products in its own ships into all ports of the other and to take away its products,
freely if possible, if not, paying no other duties than are paid by the most favored
nation. In time of war there should be an abandonment of privateering; the least possible
interference with industry on land; the inviolability of fishermen; the strictest
limitation of contraband; free commerce between neutrals and belligerents in articles not
contraband; no paper blockades; in short, free trade and a humane inter- |
Chap.
II.
1784.
March
26. |
Page 150
|
1. Secret Journals of Congress for 26 March, 1784, iii. 452-454. |
2. Secret Journals of Congress, iii. 412, 413. |
|
|
national code. These instructions congress accepted, and, to give them effect, Adams,
Franklin, and Jefferson were commissioned for two years, with the consent of any two of
them, to negotiate treaties of ten or fifteen years' duration. [1]The foreign commercial system of the nation was to be blended with the
domestic intercourse of the states. Highways by water and land from Virginia to the west
would advance its welfare and strengthen the union. Jefferson opened the subject to
Madison, [2] who, in reply, explained the necessity of a mutual appointment of
commissioners by Maryland and Virginia for regulating the navigation of the Potomac.
"The good humor into which the cession of the back lands must have put Maryland forms
an apt crisis for negotiations." [3]
Jefferson cautiously introduced the subject to Washington, [4] and
then wrote more urgently: "Your future time and wishes are sacred in my eye; but, if
the superintendence of this work would be only a dignified amusement to you, what a
monument of your retirement would follow that of your public life!" [5]
Washington "was very happy that a man of discernment and
liberality like Jefferson thought as he did." More than ten years before he had been
a principal mover of a bill for the extension of navigation from tide-water to Will's
creek. "To get the business in |
Chap.
II.
1784.
May
7. |
Page 151
|
1. Secret Journals of Congress, iii. 484, 485, and 491-499.
2. Jefferson to Madison, Annapolis, 20 Feb., 1784. MS.
3. Madison to Jefferson, 16 March, 1784. Madison, i. 74. |
4. Jefferson to Washington, 6 March, 1784. MS.
5. Jefferson to Washington, 15 March, 1784. Letters to W., ib. 62-66. |
|
|
motion," he writes, "I was obliged to comprehend James river. The plan was in a
tolerably good train when I set out for Cambridge in 1775, and would have been in an
excellent way, had it not met with difficulties in the Maryland assembly. Not a moment
ought to be lost in recommencing this business." [1]He
too, like Madison, advised concert with the men of Maryland. Conforming to their advice,
Jefferson conferred with Thomas Stone, then one of the Maryland delegates in congress, and
undertook by letters to originate the subject in the legislature of Virginia. [2]
Before the end of June the two houses unanimously requested the
executive to procure a statue of Washington, to be of the finest marble and best
workmanship, with this inscription on its pedestal:
"The general assembly of the commonwealth of Virginia have
caused this statue to be erected as a monument of affection and gratitude to George
Washington, who, to the endowments of the hero uniting the virtues of the patriot, and
exerting both in establishing the liberties of his country, has rendered his name dear to
his fellow-citizens, and given the world an immortal example of true glory." [3]
The vote, emanating from the affections of the people of Virginia,
marks his mastery over the heart of his native state. That mastery he has always used to
promote the formation of a national constitution. |
Chap.
II.
1784.
June. |
Page 152
|
1. Washington to Jefferson, 29 March, 1784. Sparks, ix. 31, 32.
2. Jefferson to Madison, 25 April, |
1784. MS. Partly printed in Rives, i. 550.
3. Hening, xi. 552. |
|
|
He had hardly reached home from the war, when he poured out his inmost thoughts to
Harrison, the doubting governor of his commonwealth:"The
prospect before us is fair; I believe all things will come right at last; but the
disinclination of the states to yield competent powers to congress for the federal
government will, if there is not a change in the system, be our downfall as a nation. This
is as clear to me as A, B, C. We have arrived at peace and independency to very little
purpose, if we cannot conquer our own prejudices. The powers of Europe begin to see this,
and our newly acquired friends, the British, are already and professedly acting upon this
ground; and wisely too, if we are determined to persevere in our folly. They know that
individual opposition to their measures is futile, and boast that we are not sufficiently
united as a nation to give a general one. Is not the indignity of this declaration, in the
very act of peace-making and conciliation, sufficient to stimulate us to vest adequate
powers in the sovereign of these United States?
"An extension of federal powers would make us one of the most
wealthy, happy, respectable, and powerful nations that ever inhabited the terrestial
globe. Without them, we shall soon be everything which is the direct reverse. I predict
the worst consequences from a half-starved, limping government, always moving upon
crutches and tottering at every step." [1]
The immensity of the ungranted public domainm which had passed from
the English crown to the |
Chap.
II.
1784. |
Page 153
|
1. Washington to Harrison, 18 Jan., 1784. Sparks, ix. 11.
|
|
|
American people invited them to establish a continental empire of republics. Lines of
communication with the western country implied its colonization. In the war, Jefferson, as
a member of the legislature, had promoted the expedition by which Virginia conquered the
region north-west of the Ohio; as governor he had taken part in its cession to the United
States. The cession had included the demand of a guarantee to Virginia of the remainder of
its territory. This the United States had refused, and Virginia receded from the demand.
On the first day of March, 1784, Jefferson, in congress, with his colleagues, Hardy,
Arthur Lee, and James Monroe, in conformity with full powers from their commonwealth,
signed, sealed, and delivered a deed by which, with some reservation of land, they ceded
to the United States all claim to the territory north-west of the Ohio. On that same day,
before the deed could be recorded and enrolled among the acts of the United States,
Jefferson, as chairman of a committee, presented a plan for the temporary government of
the western territory from the southern boundary of the United States in the latitude of
thirty-one degrees to the Lake of the Woods. It is still preserved in the national
archives in his own handwriting, and is as completely his own work as the declaration of
independence.He pressed upon Virginia to establish the
meridian of the mouth of the Kanawha as its western boundary, and to cede all beyond to
the United States. To Madison he wrote: "For God's sake, push this at the next
session of assembly. We hope North |
Chap.
II.
1784.
March
1. |
Page 154
|
Carolina will cede all beyond
the same meridian," [1] his object being to obtain cessions to the United States of
all southern territory west of the meridian of the Kanawha. In
dividing all the country north-west of the Ohio into ten states, Jefferson was controlled
by an act of congress of 1780 which was incorporated into the cession of Virginia. No land
was to be taken up till it should have been purchased from the Indian proprietors and
offered for sale by the United States. In each incipient state no property qualifications
was required either of the electors or the elected; it was enough for them to be free men,
resident, and of full age. Under the authority of congress, and following the precedent of
any one of the states, the settlers were to establish a temporary government; when they
should have increased to twenty thousand, they might institute a permanent government,
with a member in congress, having a right to debate but not to vote; and, when they should
be equal in number to the inhabitants of the least populous state, their delegates, with
the consent of nine states, as required by the confederation, were to be admitted into the
congress of the United States on an equal footing.
The ordinance contained five other articles: The new states shall
remain forever a part of the United States of America; they shall bear the same relation
to the confederation as the original states; they shall pay their apportionment of the
federal debts; they shall in their governments uphold republican |
Chap.
II.
1784.
March
1. |
Page 155 |
1. Jefferson to Madison, 20 Feb., 1784. MS.
|
|
|
forms; and after the year 1800 of the Christian era there shall be neither slavery nor
involuntary servitude in any of them.At that time slavery
prevailed throughout much more than half the lands of Europe. Jefferson, following an
impulse from his own mind, designed by his ordinance to establish from end to end of the
whole country a north and south line, at which the westward extension of slavery should be
stayed by an impassable bound. Of the men held in bondage beyond that line, he did not
propose the instant emancipation; but slavery was to be rung out with the departing
century, so that in all the western territory, whether held in 1784 by Georgia, North
Carolina, Virginia, or the United States, the sun of the new century might dawn on no
slave.
To make the decree irrevocable, he further proposed that all the
articles should form a charter of compact, to be executed in congress under the seal of
the United States, to be promulgated, and to stand as fundamental constitutions between
the thirteen original states and the new states to be erected under the ordinance.
The design of Jefferson marks an era in the history of universal
freedom. For the moment more was attempted than could be accomplished. North Carolina, in
the following June, made a cession of all her western lands, but soon revoked it; and
Virginia did not release Kentucky till it became a state of the union. Moreover, the
sixteen years during which slavery was to have a respite might nurse it into such |
Chap.
II.
1784.
March
1. |
Page 156
|
such strength that at the end
of them it would be able to defy or reverse the ordinance. Exactly on the ninth anniversary of the fight at Concord and Lexington,
Richard Dobbs Spaight of North Carolina, seconded by Jacob Read of South Carolina, moved
"to strike out" the fifth article. The presiding officer, following the rule of
the time, put the question: "Shall the words stand?" Seven states, and seven
only, were needed to carry the affirmative. Let Jefferson, who did not refrain from
describing Spaight as "a young fool," relate what followed. "The clause was
lost by an individual vote only. Ten states were present. The four eastern states, New
York, and Pennsylvania were for the clause; Jersey would have been for it, but there were
but two members, one of whom was sick in his chambers. South Carolina, Maryland, and !Virginia!
voted against it. North Carolina was divided, as would have been Virginia, had not one of
its delegates been sick in bed." [1] The absent Virginian was Monroe, who for himself
was left no evidence of such an intention, and who was again absent when in the following
year the question was revived. For North Carolina, the vote of Spaight was neutralized by
Williamson.
Six states against three, sixteen men against seven, proscribed
slavery. Jefferson bore witness against it all his life long. Wythe and himself, as
commissioners to codify the laws of Virginia, had provided for gradual emancipation. When,
in 1785, the legislature refused to consider the proposal, Jefferson |
Chap.
II.
1784.
April
19. |
Page 157 |
1. Jefferson to Madison, 25 April, 1784. MS.
|
|
|
wrote: "We must hope that an overruling Providence is preparing the deliverance of
these our suffering brethren." [1] In 1786, narrating the loss of the clause against
slavery in the ordinance of 1784, he said: "The voice of a single individual would
have prevented this abominable crime; heaven will not always be silent; the friends to the
rights of human nature will in the end prevail." [2]To
friends who visited him in the last period of his life, he delighted to renew these
aspirations of his earlier years. [3] In a letter written just forty-five days before his
death, he refers to the ordinance of 1784, saying: "My sentiments have been forty
years before the public; although I shall not live to see them consummated, they will not
die with me; but, living or dying, they will ever be in my most fervent prayer." [4]
The ordinance for the government of the north-western territory,
shorn of its proscription of slavery, was adopted, and remained in force for three years.
Later in the session, Jefferson reported an ordinance for ascertaining the mode of
locating and disposing of the public lands. The continental domain, when purchased of the
Indians, was to be divided by the surveyors into townships of ten geographical miles
square, and with such precautions that the wilderness could be mapped out into ranges of
lots so exactly as to preclude uncertainty of title. As to inheritance, the words of the
ordinance were: "The |
Chap.
II.
1784.
April
23.
May
7. |
Page 158
|
1. Jefferson, ix. 279.
2. Ibid., 276.
3. Oral communication from Wil- |
liam Campbell Preston of South Carolina.
4. Jefferson to James Heaton, 20 May, 1826. |
|
|
lands therein shall pass in descent and dower according to the customs known in the common
law by the name of gavelkind." [1] Upon this ordinance of Jefferson, most
thoughtfully prepared and written wholly by his own hand, no final vote was taken.Congress had already decided to establish a mint. For the American coinage,
Robert and Gouverneur Morris proposed the decimal system of computation, with silver as
the only metallic money, and the fourteen hundred and fortieth part of a Spanish piece of
eight reals, or, as the Americans called it, the dollar, as the unit of currency.
Jefferson chose the dollar, which circulated freely in every part of the American
continent, as the money unit for computation; and the subdivision of the dollar into a
tenth, a hundredth, and a thousandth part. For coinage, he proposed a gold coin of ten
dollars; silver coins of one dollar and of one tenth of a dollar; and copper coins of one
hundredth part of a dollar. [2] This system steadily grew in favor; and, in 1786, was
established by congress without a negative vote. [3]
The total cost of the war, from the first blood shed at Lexington to
the general orders of Washington in April, 1783, proclaiming peace, was reckoned by
Jefferson [4] at one hundred and forty millions of dollars. Congress, before the formation
of the confederacy, had emitted paper money to the amount of two hundred millions of
dollars, which at the time of its emis- |
Chap.
II.
1784. |
Page 159
|
1. Papers of Old Congress, xxx. 59. MS.
2. Jefferson, i. 54. Notes on the establishment of a money unit and |
of a coinage for the United States, Ibid., 162-174.
3. Journals of Congress, iv. 376, for 8 Aug., 1786.
4. Jefferson,m ix. 260. |
|
|
sion might, as he thought, have had the value of thirty-six millions of silver dollars;
the value of the masses of paper emitted by the several states at various stages of the
war he estimated at thirty-six millions more. This estimate of the values of the paper
money rests in part upon conjecture, and the materials for correcting it with accuracy,
especially as it regards the issues of the states, are wanting. The remaining cost of the
war, or sixty-eight millions of dollars, with the exception of about one and a half
million paid on requisition by the several states, existed on the first of January, 1784,
in the form of debts in Europe to the amount of nearly eight millions of dollars; of debts
due to the several classes of domestic creditors; and of debts due to the states for
advances on the common account. The value of the paper money issued by congress had
perished as it passed from hand to hand, and its circulation had ceased.In preparing the appropriations for the coming year, congress was met at the
threshold by an unforeseen difficulty. Bills of Morris on Holland, that were protested for
non-acceptance, would amount, with damages on protest for non-acceptance, to six hundred
and thirty-six thousand dollars. To save the honor of the country, this sum was demanded
of the separate states in a circular letter drawn by Jefferson. But, meantime, John Adams,
in Amsterdam, manfully struggled to meet the drafts, and, by combining the allurement of a
lottery with that of a very profitable loan, he succeeded.
The court of France, with delicacy and generosity, of its own motion
released the United States from |
Chap.
II.
1784. |
Page 160
|
the payment of interest on
their obligations during the war and for the first period of peace; and they on their part
by formal treaty bound themselves to the payment of interest as it should accrue from the
beginning of the year 1784. For that year, the sum required
for the several branches of the public service was estimated at about four hundred and
fifty thousand dollars; for the interest on foreign debt, nearly four hundred thousand
dollars; the balance of interest and the interest on the domestic debt, about six hundred
and eighty thousand dollars; the deficit of the last two years, one million; other arrears
connected with the debt, nearly one million three hundred thousand dollars: in all, about
four millions. This was a greater sum than could be asked for. Instead of making new
requisitions, Jefferson credited all federal payments of the states to the requisition of
eight millions of dollars in the first year of the confederacy. One half of that
requisition was remitted; of the other, three states had paid nothing, the rest had paid
less than a million and a half; a balance would remain of nearly two millions seven
hundred thousand dollars; and of this balance a requisition was made on each of the states
for its just proportion. Could the apportionment be collected within the year, it would
defray the expenses of all the departments of the general government and the interest on
the foreign and domestic loans, leaving only some part of domestic arrears to be provided
for at a later day. Could this system be carried into effect, the credit of the government
would be established. |
Chap.
II.
1784.
April
27. |
Page 161 |
Madison had acceded to the
wishes of his country, that he should be one of its representatives in the legislature,
believing that he might there best awaken Virginia to the glory of taking the lead in the
rescue of the union and the blessings staked on union from an impending catastrophe. [1]
Jefferson had kept him thoroughly informed of the movement for bringing order into the
public finances. At the instigation of Madison, Philip Mazzei, an Italian, then in quest
of a consular appointment in Europe, [2] paid a visit to Patrick Henry, "the great
leader who had been violently opposed to every idea of increasing the power of
congress." [3] On his return, Mazzei reported that the present politics of Henry
comprehended very friendly views toward the confederacy, and a support of the payment of
British debts. [4] At Richmond, in May, before the assembly
proceeded to active business, Henry sought a conference with Madison and Jones, and
declared to them that "a bold example set by Virginia would have influence on
the other states;" "he saw ruin inevitable unless something was done to give
congress a compulsory process on delinquent states." This conviction, he said, was
his only inducement for coming into the present assembly. It was agreed that Jones and
Madison should sketch some plan for giving greater power to the federal government, and
henry promised to sustain it on the floor. A majority of the assembly were new members,
composed |
Chap.
II.
1784.
May
14. |
Page 162 |
1. Gilpin, 693, 694; Elliot, 113.
2. Jefferson to Madison, 16 March, 1784. MS. |
3. Edward Bancroft to William Frazer, 28 May, 1784. MS.
4. Madison to Jefferson, 25 April, 1784. Madiso, i. 77. |
|
|
of young men and officers of the late army, so that new measures were expected. Great
hopes were formed of Madison, and those who knew him best were sure that he would not
disappoint the most sanguine expectations. [1]Virginia passed
an act empowering congress, for any term not exceeding fifteen years, to prohibit the
importation or exportation of goods to or from that state in vessels belonging to subjects
of powers with whom the United States had no commercial treaty. [2] They further consented
that the contributions of the state to the general treasury should be in proportion to the
population, counting three fifths of the slaves. All apprehension of danger from conceding
a revenue to the confederacy seemed to have passed away; and it was agreed that, pending
the acceptance of the amendment to the constitution, any apportionment of the requisitions
directed by congress for the purpose of discharging the national debt and the expenses of
the national government ought to be complied with. It was further resolved that the
accounts subsisting between the United States and individual states should be settled, and
that then the balance due ought to be enforced, if necessary, by distress on the property
of defaulting states or of their citizens. And these resolutions passed the legislature
without a division. [3] It remained only to see what effect the measures of Virginia |
Chap.
II.
1784. |
Page 163
|
1. William Short to T. Jefferson, 14 May, 1784, MS.; Madison to Jefferson, 15 May,
1784, Madison, i. 80; Edward Bancroft to William Frazer, 28 May, 1784, MS. In the letter
of Short to Jefferson, the date |
is probably an error for May 15. See Madison, i. 80, "last evening."
2. Hening, xi. 388.
3. Journal of the Committee of the States, p. 7. |
|
|
would have on the other twelve states and on herself.Experience
had proved the impossibility of keeping together a sufficient representation of the states
in congress. It began to be thought better to hold but a short and active annual session
of the national congress with compulsary attendance to its members, and appoint
commissioners of the states to conduct executive business for the rest of the year. This
proposition was one of the last which Jefferson assisted to carry through. He had wished
to visit Washington before his voyage; but, armed with at least one-and-twenty commissions
for hmself and his two associates to negotiate treaties with foreign powers, he was
obliged to repair to Boston, where, after "experiencing in the highest degree its
hospitality and civilities," [1] he embarked for France, full of hope that the
attempt to negotiate a treaty of commerce with Great Britain would meet with success. [2]
Before leaving the country, he wrote to Madison: "The best effects are produced by
sending our young statemen to congress. Here they see the affairs of the confederacy from
a high ground; they learn the importance of the union, and befriend federal measures when
they return." [3]
The committee of states came together on the fourth of June. Four
states never attended; and, as the assent of nine was required to carry any proposition
except adjournment, the absence of the negative |
Chap.
II.
1784.
July
5.
June
4. |
Page 164
|
1. Jefferson to Gerry, 2 July, 1784. Austin's Life of Gerry, i. 55. |
2. Information from Edward Bancroft, 26 Aug., 1784. MS.
3. Jefferson to Madison, 25 April, 1784. MS. |
|
|
of one state stopped all proceedings. A difference occurring on the eleventh of August,
the members from three New England states went home; the remaining six states met
irregularly till the ninteenth of that month; and then, from inability to do any manner of
business, they withdrew. The United States of America were left without any visible
representation whatever. The chief benefit from the experiment was to establish in the
minds of Americans the necessity of vesting the executive power, not in a body of men,
but, as Jefferson phrased it, in a single arbiter.This was
the state of the government when, on the first of November, Robert Morris retired from his
office as superintendent of the finances of the United States. He had conciliated the
support of the moneyed men at home. [1] His Bank of North America, necessarily of little
advantage to the United States, proved highly remunerative to its stockholders; [2] the
bankruptcy of the nation could have been prevented only by the nation itself. Congress
passed an act that for the future no person, appointed a commissioner of the treasury of
the United States, should be permitted to be engaged, either directly or indirectly, in
any trade of commerce whatsoever. [3] Before retiring, Morris announced to the
representative of France in America that he could not pay the |
Chap.
II.
1784.
Aug.
19.
Nov.
1. |
Page 165
|
1. Hamilton, i. 316, 317.
2. The divident for the first half year of the bank was four and a half per cent;
for the second, four and one fourth; for the third, six and one half; for the fourth,
eight; for the fifth, a little more than |
nine and a half per cent. Official report in Pennsylvania Packet for 6 July, 1782; 7 Jan.,
1783; 8 July, 1783; 6 Jan., 1784; 8 July, 1784.
3. Journals of Congress for 28 May, 1784. |
|
|
interest on the Dutch loan of ten million livres for which France was the guarantee; [1] a
default which deeply injured the reputation of the United States in Paris. [2] He could
still less provide for paying the interest for 1784 on the direct debt to France.The members of the fifth congress arrived so slowly at Trenton, that Marbois,
who was charged with French affairs, on the twentieth of November reported what at the
moment was true: "There is in America no general government, neither congress, nor
president, nor head of any one administrative department." [3] Six days later, while
there was still no quorum in congress, Richard Henry Lee, a delegate from Virginia, wrote
to Madison: "It is by many here suggested, as a very necessary step for congress to
take, the calling on the states to form a convention for the sole purpose of revising the
confederation, so far as to enable congress to execute with more energy, effect, and vigor
the powers assigned to it than it appears by experience that they can do under the present
state of things." In a letter of the same date Mercer said: "There will be a
motion made early in the ensuing congress for such a convention." [4] Madison, who
knew the heart of his correspondents, answered Lee firmly and yet warily: "The union
of the states is essential to their safety against foreign danger and internal contention;
the perpetuity and efficacy of the present |
Chap.
II.
1784.
Nov.
26. |
Page 166
|
1. Robert Morris to Marbois, 17 Aug., 1784. Dip. Cor., xii. 494.
2. Edward Bancroft to Lord Carmarthen, Paris, 8 Dec., 1784. MS. |
3. Marbois to Rayneval, 20 Nov., 1784. MS.
4. J. F. Mercer to Madison, 26 Nov., 1784. MS. |
|
|
system cannot be confided in;
the question, therefore, is, in what mode and at what moment the experiment for supplying
the defects ought to be made." [1] "The American
confederation," so thought the French minister at Versailles, "has a strong
tendency to dissolution; it is well that on this point we have neither obligations to
fulfil nor any interest to cherish." [2] |
Chap.
II.
1784. |
Page 167 |
1. Madison Papers, 707, 708. |
2. To Marbois, Versailles, 14 Dec., 1784. MS. |
|
|
|