Chapter II

Back Home Up Next

CHAPTER II.

VIRGINIA STATESMEN LEAD TOWARD A BETTER UNION.

1784.

 

Page 146

Of many causes promoting union, four above others exercised a steady and commanding influence. The new republic as one nation must have power to regulate its foreign commerce; to colonize its large domain; to provide an adequate revenue; and to establish justice in domestic trade by prohibiting the separate staes from impairing the obligation of contracts. Each of these four causes was of vital importance; but the necessity for regulating commerce gave the immediate impulse to a more perfect constitution. Happily, the British order in council of the second of July, 1783, restricted to British subjects and ships the carrying of American produce from American ports to any British West India island, and the carrying of the produce of those islands to any port in America. "This proclamation," wrote John Adams to congress, "is issued in full confidence that the United States cannot agree to act as one nation. They will soon see the necessity of Chap.
II.
1783.
measures to counteract their enemies. If there is not sufficient authority to draw together the minds, affections, and forces of the states in their common foreign concerns, we shall be the sport of trans-atlantic politicians, who hate liberty and every country that enjoys it. [1]

Letters of Adams and one of like tenor from Franklin having been fully considered, congress, on the twenty-ninth of Septermber, 1783, agreed that the United States could become respectable only by more energy in government; but, as usual, they only referred "the important subject under consideration" to a special committee, [2] which, having Arthur Lee for one of its members, in due time reported that "as the several states are sovereign and independent, and possess the power of acting as may to them seem best, congress will not attempt to point out the path. The mode for joint efforts will suggest itself to the good sense of America." [3]

The states could not successfully defend themselves against the policy of Great Britain by separate legislation, because it was not the interest of any one of them to exclude British vessels from their harbors unless the like measure should be adopted by every other; and a union of thirteen distinct powers would encounter the very difficulty which had so often proved insuperable. But, while every increate of the power of congress in domestic affairs roused jealousies between the states, the selfish design of a

Chap.
II.
1783.

 

 

Sept.
29.

Page 147


1.  Dip. Cor., vii. 81, 88, 100.
2.  Secret Journals of Congress, iii. 398-400.

3.  Reports of committees on increasing the powers of congress, p. 95. MS.

foreign government to repress their industry drew them together against a common adversary.

The complete cession of the north-west and the grant of the desired inpost were the offerings of Virginia to the general welfare. [1] Simultaneously, her legislature, in December, took cognizance of the aggression on equal commerce. The Virginians owned not much shipping, and had no special interest in the West India trade; but the British prohibitory policy offended their pride and their sense of honor, and, as in the war they had looked upon "union as the rock of their political salvation," so they again rang the bell to call the other states to council. They complained of "a disposition in Great Britain to gain partial advantages injurious to the rights of free commerce, and repugnant to the principles of reciprocal interest and convenience, which form the only permanent foundation of friendly intercourse;" and unanimously consented to empower congress to adopt the most effectual mode of counteracting restrictions on American navigation so long as they should be continued. [2] The governor, by direction, communicated the act to the executive authority of the other states, requesting their immediate adoption of similar measures; [3] and he sent to the delegates of his own state in congress a report of what had been done. This is the first in the series of measures through which Virginia marshalled the United States on their way to a better union.


Chap.
II.
1783.

 

Dec.
4.

 

 

 

 

 

9.


Page 148


1.  Joseph Jones to Jefferson, 21 and 29 Dec., 1783. MSS.
2.  Journal of House of Delegates, 50; Hening, xi. 313.

3.  Journal of House of Delegates for 22 Dec., 1783. Governor Harrison to the governor of Massachusetts, 25 Dec., 1783. MS.

In the fourth congress, Jefferson carried forward the work of Madison with alacrity. The two cherished for each other the closest and the most honorable friendship, agreeing in efforts to bind the states more closely in all that related to the common welfare. In their copious correspondence they opened their minds to each other with frankness and independence.

The delegates of Rhode Island insisted that the counteraction of the British navigation acts must be intrusted to each separate state; but they stood alone, Roger Sherman voting against them, and so dividing Connecticut. Then the proposal of the committee of which Jefferson was a member and of which all but Gerry were from the South, that congress,m with the assent of nine states, might exercise prohibitory powers over foreign commerce for the term of fifteen years, was adopted without opposition. [1]

Keeping in mind that, while the articles of confederation did not directly confer on congress the regulation of commerce by enactments, they granted the amplest authority to frame commercial treaties, Jefferson prepared a plan for intercourse with powers of Europe, from Britain to the Ottoman Porte, and with the Barbary states. His draft of instructions [2] described "the United States as one nation upon the principles of the federal constitution." [2] In a document of the preceding congress, mention had been made of "the federal government," and Rhode Island


Chap.
II.
1784.

 

 

  
April
30.


Page 149


1.  Journals of Congress, iv. 392, 393.
2.  Jefferson of John Q. Adams,

30 March, 1826. Jefferson, vii. 436.
3.  Secret Journals of Congress, iii. 453.

had forthwith moved to substitute the word union, conceding that there was a union of the states, but not a government; but the motion had been supported by no other state, and by no individuals outside of Rhode Island except Holton and Arthur Lee. This time Sherman and his colleague, James Wadsworth, placed Connecticut by the side of Rhode Island. They were joined only by Arthur Lee, and congress, adopting the words of Jefferson, by the vote of eight states to two, of nineteen individuals to five, decided that in treaties and in all cases arising under them the United States form "one nation." [1]

On the principles according to which commercial treaties should be framed America was unanimous. In October, 1783, congress had proposed the most perfect equality and reciprocity. [2] Jefferson, while he would accept a system of reciprocity, reported as the choice of America that there should be no navigation laws; no distinction between metropolitan and colonial ports; an equal right for each party to carry its own products in its own ships into all ports of the other and to take away its products, freely if possible, if not, paying no other duties than are paid by the most favored nation. In time of war there should be an abandonment of privateering; the least possible interference with industry on land; the inviolability of fishermen; the strictest limitation of contraband; free commerce between neutrals and belligerents in articles not contraband; no paper blockades; in short, free trade and a humane inter-


Chap.
II.
1784.

  
March
26.


Page 150


1.  Secret Journals of Congress for 26 March, 1784, iii. 452-454.

2.  Secret Journals of Congress, iii. 412, 413.

national code. These instructions congress accepted, and, to give them effect, Adams, Franklin, and Jefferson were commissioned for two years, with the consent of any two of them, to negotiate treaties of ten or fifteen years' duration. [1]

The foreign commercial system of the nation was to be blended with the domestic intercourse of the states. Highways by water and land from Virginia to the west would advance its welfare and strengthen the union. Jefferson opened the subject to Madison, [2] who, in reply, explained the necessity of a mutual appointment of commissioners by Maryland and Virginia for regulating the navigation of the Potomac. "The good humor into which the cession of the back lands must have put Maryland forms an apt crisis for negotiations." [3]

Jefferson cautiously introduced the subject to Washington, [4] and then wrote more urgently: "Your future time and wishes are sacred in my eye; but, if the superintendence of this work would be only a dignified amusement to you, what a monument of your retirement would follow that of your public life!" [5]

Washington "was very happy that a man of discernment and liberality like Jefferson thought as he did." More than ten years before he had been a principal mover of a bill for the extension of navigation from tide-water to Will's creek. "To get the business in


Chap.
II.
1784.
May
7.


Page 151


1.  Secret Journals of Congress, iii. 484, 485, and 491-499.
2.  Jefferson to Madison, Annapolis, 20 Feb., 1784. MS.
3.  Madison to Jefferson, 16 March, 1784. Madison, i. 74.

4.  Jefferson to Washington, 6 March, 1784. MS.
5.  Jefferson to Washington, 15 March, 1784. Letters to W., ib. 62-66.

motion," he writes, "I was obliged to comprehend James river. The plan was in a tolerably good train when I set out for Cambridge in 1775, and would have been in an excellent way, had it not met with difficulties in the Maryland assembly. Not a moment ought to be lost in recommencing this business." [1]

He too, like Madison, advised concert with the men of Maryland. Conforming to their advice, Jefferson conferred with Thomas Stone, then one of the Maryland delegates in congress, and undertook by letters to originate the subject in the legislature of Virginia. [2]

Before the end of June the two houses unanimously requested the executive to procure a statue of Washington, to be of the finest marble and best workmanship, with this inscription on its pedestal:

"The general assembly of the commonwealth of Virginia have caused this statue to be erected as a monument of affection and gratitude to George Washington, who, to the endowments of the hero uniting the virtues of the patriot, and exerting both in establishing the liberties of his country, has rendered his name dear to his fellow-citizens, and given the world an immortal example of true glory." [3]

The vote, emanating from the affections of the people of Virginia, marks his mastery over the heart of his native state. That mastery he has always used to promote the formation of a national constitution.


Chap.
II.
1784.

 

 

 

 

 

June.


Page 152


1.  Washington to Jefferson, 29 March, 1784. Sparks, ix. 31, 32.
2.  Jefferson to Madison, 25 April,

1784. MS. Partly printed in Rives, i. 550.
3.  Hening, xi. 552.

He had hardly reached home from the war, when he poured out his inmost thoughts to Harrison, the doubting governor of his commonwealth:

"The prospect before us is fair; I believe all things will come right at last; but the disinclination of the states to yield competent powers to congress for the federal government will, if there is not a change in the system, be our downfall as a nation. This is as clear to me as A, B, C. We have arrived at peace and independency to very little purpose, if we cannot conquer our own prejudices. The powers of Europe begin to see this, and our newly acquired friends, the British, are already and professedly acting upon this ground; and wisely too, if we are determined to persevere in our folly. They know that individual opposition to their measures is futile, and boast that we are not sufficiently united as a nation to give a general one. Is not the indignity of this declaration, in the very act of peace-making and conciliation, sufficient to stimulate us to vest adequate powers in the sovereign of these United States?

"An extension of federal powers would make us one of the most wealthy, happy, respectable, and powerful nations that ever inhabited the terrestial globe. Without them, we shall soon be everything which is the direct reverse. I predict the worst consequences from a half-starved, limping government, always moving upon crutches and tottering at every step." [1]

The immensity of the ungranted public domainm which had passed from the English crown to the


Chap.
II.
1784.


Page 153


1.  Washington to Harrison, 18 Jan., 1784. Sparks, ix. 11.


American people invited them to establish a continental empire of republics. Lines of communication with the western country implied its colonization. In the war, Jefferson, as a member of the legislature, had promoted the expedition by which Virginia conquered the region north-west of the Ohio; as governor he had taken part in its cession to the United States. The cession had included the demand of a guarantee to Virginia of the remainder of its territory. This the United States had refused, and Virginia receded from the demand. On the first day of March, 1784, Jefferson, in congress, with his colleagues, Hardy, Arthur Lee, and James Monroe, in conformity with full powers from their commonwealth, signed, sealed, and delivered a deed by which, with some reservation of land, they ceded to the United States all claim to the territory north-west of the Ohio. On that same day, before the deed could be recorded and enrolled among the acts of the United States, Jefferson, as chairman of a committee, presented a plan for the temporary government of the western territory from the southern boundary of the United States in the latitude of thirty-one degrees to the Lake of the Woods. It is still preserved in the national archives in his own handwriting, and is as completely his own work as the declaration of independence.

He pressed upon Virginia to establish the meridian of the mouth of the Kanawha as its western boundary, and to cede all beyond to the United States. To Madison he wrote: "For God's sake, push this at the next session of assembly. We hope North


Chap.
II.
1784.

 

 

 

  
March
1.


Page 154

Carolina will cede all beyond the same meridian," [1] his object being to obtain cessions to the United States of all southern territory west of the meridian of the Kanawha.

In dividing all the country north-west of the Ohio into ten states, Jefferson was controlled by an act of congress of 1780 which was incorporated into the cession of Virginia. No land was to be taken up till it should have been purchased from the Indian proprietors and offered for sale by the United States. In each incipient state no property qualifications was required either of the electors or the elected; it was enough for them to be free men, resident, and of full age. Under the authority of congress, and following the precedent of any one of the states, the settlers were to establish a temporary government; when they should have increased to twenty thousand, they might institute a permanent government, with a member in congress, having a right to debate but not to vote; and, when they should be equal in number to the inhabitants of the least populous state, their delegates, with the consent of nine states, as required by the confederation, were to be admitted into the congress of the United States on an equal footing.

The ordinance contained five other articles: The new states shall remain forever a part of the United States of America; they shall bear the same relation to the confederation as the original states; they shall pay their apportionment of the federal debts; they shall in their governments uphold republican

Chap.
II.
1784.
March
1.

Page 155


1.  Jefferson to Madison, 20 Feb., 1784. MS.


forms; and after the year 1800 of the Christian era there shall be neither slavery nor involuntary servitude in any of them.

At that time slavery prevailed throughout much more than half the lands of Europe. Jefferson, following an impulse from his own mind, designed by his ordinance to establish from end to end of the whole country a north and south line, at which the westward extension of slavery should be stayed by an impassable bound. Of the men held in bondage beyond that line, he did not propose the instant emancipation; but slavery was to be rung out with the departing century, so that in all the western territory, whether held in 1784 by Georgia, North Carolina, Virginia, or the United States, the sun of the new century might dawn on no slave.

To make the decree irrevocable, he further proposed that all the articles should form a charter of compact, to be executed in congress under the seal of the United States, to be promulgated, and to stand as fundamental constitutions between the thirteen original states and the new states to be erected under the ordinance.

The design of Jefferson marks an era in the history of universal freedom. For the moment more was attempted than could be accomplished. North Carolina, in the following June, made a cession of all her western lands, but soon revoked it; and Virginia did not release Kentucky till it became a state of the union. Moreover, the sixteen years during which slavery was to have a respite might nurse it into such


Chap.
II.
1784.
March
1.


Page 156

such strength that at the end of them it would be able to defy or reverse the ordinance.

Exactly on the ninth anniversary of the fight at Concord and Lexington, Richard Dobbs Spaight of North Carolina, seconded by Jacob Read of South Carolina, moved "to strike out" the fifth article. The presiding officer, following the rule of the time, put the question: "Shall the words stand?" Seven states, and seven only, were needed to carry the affirmative. Let Jefferson, who did not refrain from describing Spaight as "a young fool," relate what followed. "The clause was lost by an individual vote only. Ten states were present. The four eastern states, New York, and Pennsylvania were for the clause; Jersey would have been for it, but there were but two members, one of whom was sick in his chambers. South Carolina, Maryland, and !Virginia! voted against it. North Carolina was divided, as would have been Virginia, had not one of its delegates been sick in bed." [1] The absent Virginian was Monroe, who for himself was left no evidence of such an intention, and who was again absent when in the following year the question was revived. For North Carolina, the vote of Spaight was neutralized by Williamson.

Six states against three, sixteen men against seven, proscribed slavery. Jefferson bore witness against it all his life long. Wythe and himself, as commissioners to codify the laws of Virginia, had provided for gradual emancipation. When, in 1785, the legislature refused to consider the proposal, Jefferson

Chap.
II.
1784.
April
19.

Page 157


1.  Jefferson to Madison, 25 April, 1784. MS.


wrote: "We must hope that an overruling Providence is preparing the deliverance of these our suffering brethren." [1] In 1786, narrating the loss of the clause against slavery in the ordinance of 1784, he said: "The voice of a single individual would have prevented this abominable crime; heaven will not always be silent; the friends to the rights of human nature will in the end prevail." [2]

To friends who visited him in the last period of his life, he delighted to renew these aspirations of his earlier years. [3] In a letter written just forty-five days before his death, he refers to the ordinance of 1784, saying: "My sentiments have been forty years before the public; although I shall not live to see them consummated, they will not die with me; but, living or dying, they will ever be in my most fervent prayer." [4]

The ordinance for the government of the north-western territory, shorn of its proscription of slavery, was adopted, and remained in force for three years. Later in the session, Jefferson reported an ordinance for ascertaining the mode of locating and disposing of the public lands. The continental domain, when purchased of the Indians, was to be divided by the surveyors into townships of ten geographical miles square, and with such precautions that the wilderness could be mapped out into ranges of lots so exactly as to preclude uncertainty of title. As to inheritance, the words of the ordinance were: "The


Chap.
II.
1784.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
April
23.

May
7.


Page 158


1.  Jefferson, ix. 279.
2.  Ibid., 276.
3.  Oral communication from Wil-

liam Campbell Preston of South Carolina.
4.  Jefferson to James Heaton, 20 May, 1826.

lands therein shall pass in descent and dower according to the customs known in the common law by the name of gavelkind." [1] Upon this ordinance of Jefferson, most thoughtfully prepared and written wholly by his own hand, no final vote was taken.

Congress had already decided to establish a mint. For the American coinage, Robert and Gouverneur Morris proposed the decimal system of computation, with silver as the only metallic money, and the fourteen hundred and fortieth part of a Spanish piece of eight reals, or, as the Americans called it, the dollar, as the unit of currency. Jefferson chose the dollar, which circulated freely in every part of the American continent, as the money unit for computation; and the subdivision of the dollar into a tenth, a hundredth, and a thousandth part. For coinage, he proposed a gold coin of ten dollars; silver coins of one dollar and of one tenth of a dollar; and copper coins of one hundredth part of a dollar. [2] This system steadily grew in favor; and, in 1786, was established by congress without a negative vote. [3]

The total cost of the war, from the first blood shed at Lexington to the general orders of Washington in April, 1783, proclaiming peace, was reckoned by Jefferson [4] at one hundred and forty millions of dollars. Congress, before the formation of the confederacy, had emitted paper money to the amount of two hundred millions of dollars, which at the time of its emis-


Chap.
II.
1784.


Page 159


1.  Papers of Old Congress, xxx. 59. MS.
2.  Jefferson, i. 54. Notes on the establishment of a money unit and

of a coinage for the United States, Ibid., 162-174.
3.  Journals of Congress, iv. 376, for 8 Aug., 1786.
4.  Jefferson,m ix. 260.

sion might, as he thought, have had the value of thirty-six millions of silver dollars; the value of the masses of paper emitted by the several states at various stages of the war he estimated at thirty-six millions more. This estimate of the values of the paper money rests in part upon conjecture, and the materials for correcting it with accuracy, especially as it regards the issues of the states, are wanting. The remaining cost of the war, or sixty-eight millions of dollars, with the exception of about one and a half million paid on requisition by the several states, existed on the first of January, 1784, in the form of debts in Europe to the amount of nearly eight millions of dollars; of debts due to the several classes of domestic creditors; and of debts due to the states for advances on the common account. The value of the paper money issued by congress had perished as it passed from hand to hand, and its circulation had ceased.

In preparing the appropriations for the coming year, congress was met at the threshold by an unforeseen difficulty. Bills of Morris on Holland, that were protested for non-acceptance, would amount, with damages on protest for non-acceptance, to six hundred and thirty-six thousand dollars. To save the honor of the country, this sum was demanded of the separate states in a circular letter drawn by Jefferson. But, meantime, John Adams, in Amsterdam, manfully struggled to meet the drafts, and, by combining the allurement of a lottery with that of a very profitable loan, he succeeded.

The court of France, with delicacy and generosity, of its own motion released the United States from


Chap.
II.
1784.


Page 160

the payment of interest on their obligations during the war and for the first period of peace; and they on their part by formal treaty bound themselves to the payment of interest as it should accrue from the beginning of the year 1784.

For that year, the sum required for the several branches of the public service was estimated at about four hundred and fifty thousand dollars; for the interest on foreign debt, nearly four hundred thousand dollars; the balance of interest and the interest on the domestic debt, about six hundred and eighty thousand dollars; the deficit of the last two years, one million; other arrears connected with the debt, nearly one million three hundred thousand dollars: in all, about four millions. This was a greater sum than could be asked for. Instead of making new requisitions, Jefferson credited all federal payments of the states to the requisition of eight millions of dollars in the first year of the confederacy. One half of that requisition was remitted; of the other, three states had paid nothing, the rest had paid less than a million and a half; a balance would remain of nearly two millions seven hundred thousand dollars; and of this balance a requisition was made on each of the states for its just proportion. Could the apportionment be collected within the year, it would defray the expenses of all the departments of the general government and the interest on the foreign and domestic loans, leaving only some part of domestic arrears to be provided for at a later day. Could this system be carried into effect, the credit of the government would be established.

Chap.
II.
1784.

 

April
27.

Page 161

Madison had acceded to the wishes of his country, that he should be one of its representatives in the legislature, believing that he might there best awaken Virginia to the glory of taking the lead in the rescue of the union and the blessings staked on union from an impending catastrophe. [1] Jefferson had kept him thoroughly informed of the movement for bringing order into the public finances. At the instigation of Madison, Philip Mazzei, an Italian, then in quest of a consular appointment in Europe, [2] paid a visit to Patrick Henry, "the great leader who had been violently opposed  to every idea of increasing the power of congress." [3] On his return, Mazzei reported that the present politics of Henry comprehended very friendly views toward the confederacy, and a support of the payment of British debts. [4]

At Richmond, in May, before the assembly proceeded to active business, Henry sought a conference with Madison and Jones, and declared to them that "a bold example set  by Virginia would have influence on the other states;" "he saw ruin inevitable unless something was done to give congress a compulsory process on delinquent states." This conviction, he said, was his only inducement for coming into the present assembly. It was agreed that Jones and Madison should sketch some plan for giving greater power to the federal government, and henry promised to sustain it on the floor. A majority of the assembly were new members, composed

Chap.
II.
1784.

 

 

 

 

May
14.

Page 162


1.  Gilpin, 693, 694; Elliot, 113.
2.  Jefferson to Madison, 16 March, 1784. MS.

3.  Edward Bancroft to William Frazer, 28 May, 1784. MS.
4.  Madison to Jefferson, 25 April, 1784. Madiso, i. 77.

of young men and officers of the late army, so that new measures were expected. Great hopes were formed of Madison, and those who knew him best were sure that he would not disappoint the most sanguine expectations. [1]

Virginia passed an act empowering congress, for any term not exceeding fifteen years, to prohibit the importation or exportation of goods to or from that state in vessels belonging to subjects of powers with whom the United States had no commercial treaty. [2] They further consented that the contributions of the state to the general treasury should be in proportion to the population, counting three fifths of the slaves. All apprehension of danger from conceding a revenue to the confederacy seemed to have passed away; and it was agreed that, pending the acceptance of the amendment to the constitution, any apportionment of the requisitions directed by congress for the purpose of discharging the national debt and the expenses of the national government ought to be complied with. It was further resolved that the accounts subsisting between the United States and individual states should be settled, and that then the balance due ought to be enforced, if necessary, by distress on the property of defaulting states or of their citizens. And these resolutions passed the legislature without a division. [3] It remained only to see what effect the measures of Virginia


Chap.
II.
1784.


Page 163


1.  William Short to T. Jefferson, 14 May, 1784, MS.; Madison to Jefferson, 15 May, 1784, Madison, i. 80; Edward Bancroft to William Frazer, 28 May, 1784, MS. In the letter of Short to Jefferson, the date

is probably an error for May 15. See Madison, i. 80, "last evening."
2.  Hening, xi. 388.
3.  Journal of the Committee of the States, p. 7.

would have on the other twelve states and on herself.

Experience had proved the impossibility of keeping together a sufficient representation of the states in congress. It began to be thought better to hold but a short and active annual session of the national congress with compulsary attendance to its members, and appoint commissioners of the states to conduct executive business for the rest of the year. This proposition was one of the last which Jefferson assisted to carry through. He had wished to visit Washington before his voyage; but, armed with at least one-and-twenty commissions for hmself and his two associates to negotiate treaties with foreign powers, he was obliged to repair to Boston, where, after "experiencing in the highest degree its hospitality and civilities," [1] he embarked for France, full of hope that the attempt to negotiate a treaty of commerce with Great Britain would meet with success. [2] Before leaving the country, he wrote to Madison: "The best effects are produced by sending our young statemen to congress. Here they see the affairs of the confederacy from a high ground; they learn the importance of the union, and befriend federal measures when they return." [3]

The committee of states came together on the fourth of June. Four states never attended; and, as the assent of nine was required to carry any proposition except adjournment, the absence of the negative


Chap.
II.
1784.

 

 

 

 

 

 

  
July
5.

 

 

 

 

June
4.


Page 164


1.  Jefferson to Gerry, 2 July, 1784. Austin's Life of Gerry, i. 55.

2.  Information from Edward Bancroft, 26 Aug., 1784. MS.
3.  Jefferson to Madison, 25 April, 1784. MS.

of one state stopped all proceedings. A difference occurring on the eleventh of August, the members from three New England states went home; the remaining six states met irregularly till the ninteenth of that month; and then, from inability to do any manner of business, they withdrew. The United States of America were left without any visible representation whatever. The chief benefit from the experiment was to establish in the minds of Americans the necessity of vesting the executive power, not in a body of men, but, as Jefferson phrased it, in a single arbiter.

This was the state of the government when, on the first of November, Robert Morris retired from his office as superintendent of the finances of the United States. He had conciliated the support of the moneyed men at home. [1] His Bank of North America, necessarily of little advantage to the United States, proved highly remunerative to its stockholders; [2] the bankruptcy of the nation could have been prevented only by the nation itself. Congress passed an act that for the future no person, appointed a commissioner of the treasury of the United States, should be permitted to be engaged, either directly or indirectly, in any trade of commerce whatsoever. [3] Before retiring, Morris announced to the representative of France in America that he could not pay the


Chap.
II.
1784.
Aug.
19.

 

 

 

  
Nov.
1.


Page 165


1.  Hamilton, i. 316, 317.
2.  The divident for the first half year of the bank was four and a half per cent; for the second, four and one fourth; for the third, six and one half; for the fourth, eight; for the fifth, a little more than

nine and a half per cent. Official report in Pennsylvania Packet for 6 July, 1782; 7 Jan., 1783; 8 July, 1783; 6 Jan., 1784; 8 July, 1784.
3.  Journals of Congress for 28 May, 1784.

interest on the Dutch loan of ten million livres for which France was the guarantee; [1] a default which deeply injured the reputation of the United States in Paris. [2] He could still less provide for paying the interest for 1784 on the direct debt to France.

The members of the fifth congress arrived so slowly at Trenton, that Marbois, who was charged with French affairs, on the twentieth of November reported what at the moment was true: "There is in America no general government, neither congress, nor president, nor head of any one administrative department." [3] Six days later, while there was still no quorum in congress, Richard Henry Lee, a delegate from Virginia, wrote to Madison: "It is by many here suggested, as a very necessary step for congress to take, the calling on the states to form a convention for the sole purpose of revising the confederation, so far as to enable congress to execute with more energy, effect, and vigor the powers assigned to it than it appears by experience that they can do under the present state of things." In a letter of the same date Mercer said: "There will be a motion made early in the ensuing congress for such a convention." [4] Madison, who knew the heart of his correspondents, answered Lee firmly and yet warily: "The union of the states is essential to their safety against foreign danger and internal contention; the perpetuity and efficacy of the present


Chap.
II.
1784.

 

Nov.

 

 

26.


Page 166


1.  Robert Morris to Marbois, 17 Aug., 1784. Dip. Cor., xii. 494.
2.  Edward Bancroft to Lord Carmarthen, Paris, 8 Dec., 1784. MS.

3.  Marbois to Rayneval, 20 Nov., 1784. MS.
4.  J. F. Mercer to Madison, 26 Nov., 1784. MS.
system cannot be confided in; the question, therefore, is, in what mode and at what moment the experiment for supplying the defects ought to be made." [1]

"The American confederation," so thought the French minister at Versailles, "has a strong tendency to dissolution; it is well that on this point we have neither obligations to fulfil nor any interest to cherish." [2]

Chap.
II.
1784.

Page 167


1.  Madison Papers, 707, 708.

2.  To Marbois, Versailles, 14 Dec., 1784. MS.